Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen: unusual case presentation in an intravenous drug user

  1. Carlos Sánchez Belmar 1,
  2. Alexandra White 2,
  3. Mudassar Majeed 3 and
  4. Henry Paul Redmond 4
  1. 1 Department of General Surgery, Mallow General Hospital, Mallow, Ireland
  2. 2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
  3. 3 Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Cork University Hospital Group, Cork, Ireland
  4. 4 Department of General Surgery, Cork University Hospital Group, Cork, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alexandra White; ali_white5@hotmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:18 May 2020
First published:21 Jun 2020
Online issue publication:21 Jun 2020

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

An unusual presentation of sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation in a 42-year-old man who was admitted with jaundice, deranged liver function tests and subsequently diagnosed with acute hepatitis C infection in the context of recent intravenous drug use. During his admission, he had an ultrasound of the abdomen followed by a CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis which showed splenomegaly and a large splenic lower pole mass that was hypoechoic and concerning for lymphoma. A bone marrow biopsy showed no evidence of lymphoma and an ultrasound-guided biopsy of the splenic mass suggested unusual features with vascular proliferation, either neoplastic or reactive, with no evidence of lymphoma or high-grade sarcoma. Given the concern for malignancy, an open splenectomy was required to determine the nature of the lesion with histologic findings consistent with a non-neoplastic benign vascular lesion favouring sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation.

Background

Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) is a rare, recently recognised and defined in 2004,1 non-neoplastic benign vascular lesion of the spleen with unknown aetiology.2 3

Most patients are asymptomatic with majority of these lesions found incidentally on imaging,2 4 although as many as 16% complain of abdominal pain which is reported as being the most predominant symptom if present.2 While these tumours show characteristic radiological findings reflecting the underlying pathology, the differential diagnosis from other splenic tumours or malignant lesions is quite challenging and a confirmed diagnosis of SANT requires histopathology analysis.4

Our aim is to bring further attention to this rare condition.

Case presentation

A 42-year-old man with a history of the bicuspid aortic valve with aortic regurgitation and dilated root of the aorta (EF >55% and an aortic root of 4.8 cm), active smoker, intravenous drug user and previously hepatitis C antibody positive/antigen negative in 2013, taking methadone 40 mL one time a day and ramipril 1.25 mg one time a day, was admitted to University Hospital’s emergency department with symptoms of generalised weakness and a feeling of being unwell for a week with several episodes of vomiting and headaches.

At the time of presentation, his temperature was 37.1°C, heart rate 71 bpm, respiratory rate 20 breaths per minute, SpO2 99% and blood pressure was 101/60 mm Hg. Initial laboratory investigations included erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 16 mm/hr, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 978 IU/L, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 295 IU/L, total bilirubin 93 umol/L and was diagnosed with hepatitis C genotype 1A infection in the context of recent intravenous drug use.

Investigations

During his admission, he underwent an ultrasound of the abdomen (figure 1) showing a large periportal lymph node, measuring up to 1.4 cm in short axis, possibly secondary to the hepatitis and splenomegaly (16.71 cm) with a suspected 7–8 cm hypoechoic mass in the lower pole concerning for lymphoma. On the basis of these results, a CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis (TAP) was advised for further evaluation.

Figure 1

US abdomen—splenomegaly (16.71 cm).

CT TAP was performed with findings corresponding to the abnormality demonstrated on ultrasound: splenomegaly measuring 18.3 cm in interpolar length and a poorly defined slightly hypo-attenuating and relatively heterogeneous mass in the inferior pole of the spleen measuring approximately 7.2×7×8.5 cm (figure 2). This was reported to be suspicious for malignancy, most likely lymphoma, and a biopsy was recommended to confirm this hypothesis. Of note, the CT also demonstrated a simple cyst in segment IV of the liver, multiple mildly prominent upper abdominal nodes which did not reach the size criteria for enlargement and were deemed of uncertain clinical significance along with multiple indeterminate pulmonary nodules bilaterally that were advised to be followed on subsequent CT examinations.

Figure 2

CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis—splenomegaly with a poorly defined slightly hypo-attenuating and relatively heterogeneous mass in the inferior pole of the spleen measuring approximately 7.2×7×8.5 cm.

An MRI of the upper abdomen was performed. This was reported and compared with previous imaging. The MRI demonstrated and reconfirmed the presence of an 8 cm in diameter splenic mass with moderate enhancement, suspicious for malignancy (figure 3).

Figure 3

MRI abdomen—splenic mass with moderate enhancement.

The patient was reviewed by haematology and a bone marrow biopsy was performed. The aspirate showed no evidence of lymphoma. An ultrasound guided biopsy of his spleen was arranged showing features suggesting a vascular proliferation either neoplastic or reactive. Although there was no overt evidence of lymphoma or high-grade sarcoma, the features were felt to be unusual and an external opinion was sought in the Bethesda Medical Center in the USA and the correspondence expressed that the sample tested presented evidence of infarction and inflammation but that given the size of the splenic lesion, it would not be representative. On the basis of these results and persistent concern for lymphoma, the need for an elective splenectomy was suggested.

Outcome and follow-up

The case was discussed at a sarcoma multidisciplinary meeting where the consensus was for elective splenectomy. Prior to the procedure, it was arranged for the patient to receive the 13-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (Prevnar), the MenACWY vaccine and hemophilus B vaccine.

On 2 November 2017, the patient underwent an open splenectomy with a midline laparotomy incision, closure with 2.0 polydioxanone suture and clips to the skin. A PICO single use negative pressure wound therapy dressing was applied to the wound and no intraoperative nor postoperative complications were documented. Two specimens were sent to the laboratory: an omental biopsy and the spleen (figure 4). The omental biopsy was reported to be benign omental tissue, negative for malignancy.

Figure 4

Specimen: spleen measuring 18×11×6 cm and weighted 444.6 g, revealing a 8×5.2×5.3 cm multinodular tumour.

The spleen measured 18×11×6 cm and weighted 444.6 grams, revealing an 8×5.2×5.3 cm multinodular tumour. The background parenchyma was unremarkable. The microscopic report of the spleen showed a multinodular vascular proliferation composed of vascular channels of variable calibre lined by plump endothelial cells with intervening bland ovoid cells and fibro-hyaline stroma. Interspersed red blood cells and mononuclear inflammatory cells were present but there was no evidence of significant nuclear atypia, mitoses or necrosis and lymphoma.

The histologic findings were consistent with a benign vascular neoplasm with the overall constellation of morphologic and immunohistochemical features favouring sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation.

Discussion

Spleens affected with SANT are generally normal in size but may present as being enlarged. It is considered to be a female-predominant disease, with a female-to-male ratio of 2:1. The median age of presentation is 54 years but ranges from 22 to 74 years, with the majority of the patients presenting in the age group of 30–60 years.2 4

These tumours bare multiple uncapsulated well-circumscribed angiomatoid nodules in a radiating pattern with a central stellate fibrous stroma and hemosiderin deposits. They are surrounded by variable lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates, spindle cells and concentric collagen fibres demonstrating an inflammatory and myofibroblastic response, accompanied by numerous erythrocytes. Within the nodules, numerous slit-like vascular spaces are seen that are lined by pericytes and endothelial cells. These phenotypically resemble normal splenic vasculature, such as sinusoids, capillaries and small veins. Mitotic figures are extremely unusual although rare mitosis have been documented. Nuclear atypia should not be prominent and necrosis is almost always absent.5

Distinctive radiological features include a solitary, round, lobulated mass with early peripheral enhancing radiating lines and progressive enhancement of the angiomatous nodules with a delayed enhancement of the fibrous tissue. This should be accompanied by a hypo-intense T2 signal intensity from the hemosiderin deposits.6

The differential diagnosis of SANT includes several other benign and malignant lesions such as littoral cell angiomas, hemangiomas, lymphangiomas, splenic hamartomas, hemangioendotheliomas and angiosarcomas.2 3 Unconfirmed recent studies have suggested a relation between SANT and splenic inflammatory pseudotumour.2

Learning points

  • Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) is a non-neoplastic benign vascular lesion with a good prognosis and no tendency for recurrence after splenectomy.

  • Most patients are asymptomatic with majority of the lesions found incidentally on imaging.

  • A diagnosis of SANT is based on histopathology analysis

Acknowledgments

With many thanks to Professor Redmond and his team.

Footnotes

  • Contributors CSB: collection of data and images, writing and reporting of initial draft and subsequent drafts with corrections and obtaining patient consent. AW: literature review, guidance/planning and conduct of paper, editing and proof reading of final draft, editing of images and submission of paper. MM: general supervision and planning, proof reading of drafts, guidance and input from theatre, operation details and guidance for acquisition of patient consent. HPR: head of department, general supervision and planning, final review of article and conception/initial idea to write report.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer